The equipment isflexible to make both standard size signs as well as dominator LED signs tenfeet long The capacity is over 150,000 signs per year. “We are very excited about our new production facility and the new innovation,quality control and environmental benefits it will provide our customers,” saidDavid Chiang, Chairman of Rocus USA. Alluma Tech`s line of Lite Tech LED products provide illuminated features atdramatically lower costs. The Lite Tech designs offer the lowest profileilluminated sign and replaces old fluorescent illumination at a brightness levelto match and exceed neon. “There are many claims of LED products achieving as bright as neonillumination,” added Ray Starsiak, Executive Vice President of Alluma Tech.”They will last at that level of brightness for 6 to 12 to 18 months.
Ourclients expectation is for LED signs to stay bright as long as fluorescent andneon illuminated signs. David Chiang`s research and development of this productline focused on sustainable brightness The roots of this technology draft offMr. Chiang`s accomplishments in neon signs, more efficient power transformingand mixing neon tube phosphors with screening ink to increase brightness.” As a “GREEN alternative” Lite Tech LED products offer an energy savings of 40 to50%. Packaging and distribution costs are also reduced dramatically for the mostenvironmentally friendly sign option in the marketplace.
“Our philosophy at Alluma Tech has always been to lead the industry on afoundation of production leadership and our new production facility will keepAlluma Tech at the forefront of industry leadership in the manufacturingprocess,” said Mike Nissen, President of Alluma Tech. Photos/Multimedia Gallery Available: http:// and AssociatesHank Blank, Copyright Business Wire 2009. COSTA MESA, Calif.–(Business Wire)–Gregory G. Petersen, Chief Trial Counsel for the Petersen Law Firm, A LawCorporation, today announced that the United States District Court for theCentral District of California ruled that the Los Angeles Police Department(“LAPD”) must pay for the time spent by officers at the beginning and end oftheir shifts while donning and doffing their equipment, uniforms and safetygear.
The Court`s ruling, issued May 5, 2009, applies to three Los AngelesPolice Officer overtime lawsuits, which are named Alaniz, et al v City of LosAngeles (“Alaniz”), Mata, et al v City of Los Angeles (“Mata”) and Nolan, etal v City of Los Angeles (“Nolan”). These lawsuits seek compensation for LAPDofficers holding the rank of Lieutenant and below for all work performed beforeand after the officers` regularly scheduled shifts, interrupted rest periods andother activities that are routinely not compensated These three lawsuits, all originally filed by Mr Petersen, affect all uniformedpersonnel of the LAPD. Subsequent to the filing of the Alaniz lawsuit, GregHafif with the Law Offices of Herbert Hafif, joined the plaintiffs` team ofattorneys and serves as co-counsel in the Alaniz, Mata and Nolan lawsuits, aswell as Edwards v City of Long Beach and Reed v. County of Orange, similar FLSAovertime lawsuits filed on behalf of Long Beach Police Officers and OrangeCounty Deputy Sheriffs, respectively Mr. Petersen commented, “Management hostility about the officers` complaintsthat the LAPD illegally refuses to pay overtime has been displayed inexpressions of anger from Chief Bratton.